COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE US AND CHINAS POLICIES TOWARDS SOUTH ASIA IN THE 21ST CENTURY IMPLICATIONS FOR PAKISTAN

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-III).02      10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-III).02      Published : Sep 2022
Authored by : ManzoorKhanAfridi , Naveed Anjum , Zaheer Abbas

02 Pages : 14-22

References

  • Ali, S.M. (2020, December). The U.S.-China Strategic Rivalry and its Implications for Pakistan. Stimpson.
  • Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape the Thucydides Trap?. New York, United States of America: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Allison, G. (2017, June 9). The Thucydides Trap. Foreign Policy.
  • Baker, D. (2020, December 26). China Has the World’s Largest Economy: Get Over It. Center for Economic and Policy Research.
  • Burgees, S. (2021). Regional Security Complex and African Foreign Policies. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs.
  • Buzan, B. and Waever, O. (2019). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carter, B. (2015, December 16). Is China’s economy really the largest in the world?. BBC.
  • Flippo, B. (2021, June). The US-China rivalry in South Asia and Pakistan’s hedging dilemma (Policy Brief No. 60). Global Governance Program.
  • Huaxia. (2021, November 07). China’s WTO entry benefits U.S., global growth.
  • Khalid, S. (2013). China’s Policy Towards South Asia: An Appraisal. Defense Spring Forum, 1-9.
  • Kugelman, M. (2016 October, 5). U.S Policy in South Asia: Imperatives and Challenges. Wilson Center.
  • Press Trust of India. (2017 October, 13). China lifting 800 million people out of poverty is historic: World Bank. Business Standard.
  • Serrikkaliyeva, A. (2017, July). Does China Seek the Geopolitical Agenda of the SCO? Eurasian Research Institute, 118, 11-33.
  • Song, P. (2021, February 23). Will U.S.-China Competition Divide South Asia Along Great Power Fault Line?. Foreign Policy Research Institute, 4.
  • Wong, C (2011), The Fiscal Stimulus Programme and Public Governance Issues in China, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 11(3), 1-22.

Cite this article

    APA : Afridi, M. K., Anjum, N., & Abbas, Z. (2022). Comparative Study of the US and China's Policies towards South Asia in the 21st Century: Implications for Pakistan. Global Foreign Policies Review, V(III), 14-22 . https://doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-III).02
    CHICAGO : Afridi, Manzoor Khan, Naveed Anjum, and Zaheer Abbas. 2022. "Comparative Study of the US and China's Policies towards South Asia in the 21st Century: Implications for Pakistan." Global Foreign Policies Review, V (III): 14-22 doi: 10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-III).02
    HARVARD : AFRIDI, M. K., ANJUM, N. & ABBAS, Z. 2022. Comparative Study of the US and China's Policies towards South Asia in the 21st Century: Implications for Pakistan. Global Foreign Policies Review, V, 14-22 .
    MHRA : Afridi, Manzoor Khan, Naveed Anjum, and Zaheer Abbas. 2022. "Comparative Study of the US and China's Policies towards South Asia in the 21st Century: Implications for Pakistan." Global Foreign Policies Review, V: 14-22
    MLA : Afridi, Manzoor Khan, Naveed Anjum, and Zaheer Abbas. "Comparative Study of the US and China's Policies towards South Asia in the 21st Century: Implications for Pakistan." Global Foreign Policies Review, V.III (2022): 14-22 Print.
    OXFORD : Afridi, Manzoor Khan, Anjum, Naveed, and Abbas, Zaheer (2022), "Comparative Study of the US and China's Policies towards South Asia in the 21st Century: Implications for Pakistan", Global Foreign Policies Review, V (III), 14-22
    TURABIAN : Afridi, Manzoor Khan, Naveed Anjum, and Zaheer Abbas. "Comparative Study of the US and China's Policies towards South Asia in the 21st Century: Implications for Pakistan." Global Foreign Policies Review V, no. III (2022): 14-22 . https://doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-III).02